I think I got your opinion loud and clear.
But be careful if you cite othrs.
@sylumer and @martinpacker are also regulars an we know each other a bit.
Their replies do not actuality ar push back.
On the othe hand I count many users who do not disagree on mt prefixng or marking their thread.
I would really love if more people would share their opinion.
I will think about it. That was one reason for starting this thread.
Cheers
Andreas
I want to add that I did not invent the idea.
I have seen it on many threads from others
like this
On some threads Greg himself used it.
I would argue that the tags system with emojis are better
By looking through the forum I found that the search therm does not work well with it
@DaveEmme Iām afraid youāre in danger of misrepresenting my position - by quoting meā¦
ā¦ The reason I asked my question was to encourage standardisation. I think @sylumer was following my line of thinking - though I donāt want to put words into his mouth.
And what @Andreas_Haberle is doing here is worthwhile.
(I looked up who was at Level 3, like me, and itās a small number of people who have made sustained positive contributions here. Iām proud to be in their company.)
I looked up who was at Level 3
Since Iām still learning about this Discourse feature: how can you do that?
(I might be āblindā because I mainly use Fig to engage in Discourse forums)
I donāt know. 
Because I am Level 3 I saw some link to who was at the same level. It might be privileged information - but I hope not.
(And I, for one, am not the kind of person to feel superior at Level 3.)
@_rob This lookup is done by the Discourse badges
https://forums.getdrafts.com/badges/3/regular
another way to āevaluateā is to look at the users profile page by taping on the avatar two times
you will see a page like this one:
Thanks for that link; I had not figured out that a level is just another badge.
PS: Fig shows the level behind the username in a post
This is optional. I may be bragging about it 
Thanks all for your feedback
I hope that I will read more of @DaveEmme and @_rob in this forum.
I leave it to Greg Pierce to give the āverdictā on that topic.
But you might have noticed that I undid my title changes.
Yes, sorry to be absent from this topic, it was a busy week.
For now, I think itās best that as a matter of course regular users only change titles or posts they did not originate where it is a valuable clarification (e.g. title did not match the content), or to correct a typo/error.
The intent is very good to help keep things better organized, but a little more than we need here for now and a little confusing, especially for new and infrequent visitors.
Iām not opposed to using tags for some of that status tracking if people find it helpfulā¦but Iām also not going to publish a style-guide insisting on it.
Thanks Greg.
I think I forgot the view of new users and how they think about a change from another user.
So I will stop changing titles aggressively and use this āsuper powerā with the new mindset.